Is it Time to Outsource Internal Auditing?

At the recent 47th annual International GMP Conference in Athens, Georgia, I discussed the fact that the objective of internal auditing is to self-identify opportunities for improvement. 

For the quality side of operations, the goal is to ensure that quality systems are properly designed and functioning as intended. I have been asked by senior leaders in some organizations, “If I have an internal auditing team and procedure, why am I still receiving observations during regulatory audits?” The answer is complex and depends on both the internal environment of the company and the external business environment in which it is operating.

The fundamentals for having an effective internal auditing program really haven’t changed since the practice was developed in the early 1940s as companies rapidly grew to meet the production demands for materials during the second world war. It begins with senior leadership being committed to quality and compliance, prioritizing remediation of any findings. It requires a program with clear objectives and procedures designed to assess and correct, if necessary, any aspects of the quality system that may compromise product quality or regulatory compliance. 

Finally, a successful program requires auditors who have the technical expertise to objectively evaluate the system coupled with the skills to communicate effectively up and down the organization what changes are required. Without all these factors in place, a company’s internal auditing program quickly becomes a bureaucratic exercise consuming significant resources but yielding little benefit.

In today’s pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, changes both in rapidly advancing technologies and in the general work culture are driving the need to alter our approach to internal auditing. 

The rapid growth of biopharmaceuticals coupled with the accelerating trend to utilize third parties to manufacture clinical and commercial materials are redefining what ‘internal auditing’ needs to achieve. 

Further, the landscape of work culture is changing. Many new and smaller start-up companies are often populated by less experienced staff and have much higher turnover rates. This contrasts an era when only large multinational pharmaceutical companies dominated the development and manufacturing of medicines. This tendency toward staff churn is undermining the effectiveness of internal auditing to help ensure self-regulation of quality and compliance. 

The incredible advances in new therapies and vaccines to treat and cure diseases require innovative, ‘out of the box’ thinking. This revolution also demands new approaches to internal auditing. We need to redefine approaches in ways that allow the process to achieve quality and compliance in this shifting landscape. 

In this environment where companies have limited internal resources and outsource manufacturing to third parties, should we follow the same path developed more than 80 years ago? Or should companies turn to third-party resources to provide objective subject matter experts to periodically conduct audits covering internal quality systems and the quality/compliance relationship with external manufacturing partners? 

Recent FDA inspection data shows that the major observational trends have not changed significantly in the last 20 years, so internal auditing in its current form has not proven effective in driving needed change.

An effective internal auditing program is but one critical element in maintaining product quality and the impact can only be seen over time in a consistent and well-run program. A change in how we conduct internal auditing is needed, outsourcing for some may be the answer.


QxP Vice President Mike Levitt started his more than 30-year career in pharma leadership as Director of Production Operations at Eli Lilly and Company back in 1989.

Cost Of Quality: Worth Every Cent In Bio/Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Crystal Mersh
May 24, 2023

Pharmaceutical Quality is NOT a Spectator Sport

Mike Levitt
May 22, 2023

The Six Keys for Effective Deviation Investigators

Mike Levitt
May 18, 2023

There Has to be a Better Way to Train

Tyler DeWitt, Ph.D.
May 15, 2023

Cell and Gene: Article Series on CGT’s Key Drivers

Mark Roache
May 8, 2023

Bacterial Endotoxin Testing is on the Move

Christine Feaster
May 5, 2023

Top 20 Pharma Company Chooses QxP Virtuosi® Platform

Vanessa Figueroa
May 3, 2023

Crystal Clear: Controls are not enough

Crystal Mersh
April 22, 2023

Myth #1: Complying with Regulations and Product Specifications

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Myth #2: Proactively Remediating Bad Inspection Outcomes: What’s the benefit?

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Is it Time to Outsource Internal Auditing?

Mike Levitt
April 18, 2023

Quality is Number One, Even When Trying to Address Supply Chain Issues

Christine Feaster
April 14, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 2

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 1

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023