Strategic role of Quality Executive Partners in FDA Pre-Meetings for Foreign and Domestic Manufacturers

Quality Executive Partners (QxP) plays an even greater strategic role in shaping the narrative, anticipating FDA concerns, and ensuring thorough documentation, especially for advanced or outsourced manufacturing models.  With changes in political administration there are few policy shifts and enforcement trends worth noting that may influence how these meetings are approached.

1. Emphasis on Advanced Manufacturing & Supply Chain Resilience

The current administration has continued to support initiatives started under previous administrations to modernize pharmaceutical manufacturing.  This includes advanced manufacturing (e.g., continuous manufacturing, real-time release testing).  Stress on domestic production incentives for critical drugs/therapies for chronic conditions and biologics.  These areas of focus could lead to more scrutiny in pre-approval meetings for manufacturers using new technologies or non-domestic sites—consultants may be especially valuable in helping sponsors frame these discussions effectively.

2. Heightened Focus on Quality & Supply Chain Oversight

There’s an ongoing FDA push for proactive quality risk management, especially for Sterile products, complex biologics, or outsourced manufacturing.  Foreign sites, where increased remote and hybrid inspections have been a thing of the most recent past have changed last week to be more frequent and unsurprisingly unannounced.  These areas of focus may result in tougher pre-approval inspections and more detailed CMC inquiries during meetings—emphasizing the need for well-prepared briefing packages and clear process validation data.

3. Equity, Access, and Shortage Mitigation

There is extreme political pressure to reduce drug shortages and improve access to generics and biosimilars has led to faster review timelines for certain priority generics.  Increased scrutiny on supply chain robustness and site redundancy during pre-approval discussions is in focus.  And if your product falls under priority pathways (e.g., CGT, 505(b)(2), accelerated approval, biosimilars), expect closer FDA attention to your CMC readiness and greater emphasis on post-approval commitments.

4. Administrative Tone: Transparency & Data Integrity

FDA leadership continues to stress transparency, data integrity, and enforcement, especially following several high-profile manufacturing issues (e.g., contamination, mislabeling, or unreliable data).  Expect pre-approval meetings to reflect this stance, with direct questions about data systems, validation status, and GMP compliance—areas where consultants can add real value in preparing responses.

In summary, we know that the core structure and utility of pre-approval manufacturing meetings are unchanged.  What’s shifting is the regulatory tone and focus—more proactive, risk-based, and digitally informed. Consultants now play an even greater strategic role in shaping the narrative, anticipating FDA concerns, and ensuring thorough documentation, especially for advanced or outsourced manufacturing models.


The Role We Play

1. Strategic Planning & Meeting Justification

QxP helps determine whether a pre-approval manufacturing meeting is appropriate.  We assist in crafting the rationale and objectives for requesting the meeting. We ensure the timing aligns with regulatory milestones (e.g., prior to pre-approval inspection or in response to late-cycle review questions).

2. Meeting Request Submission

QxP drafts the formal meeting request letter, ensuring it follows FDA’s expectations (per guidance like the “Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants…”).  We then define and prioritize questions to the FDA, focusing on areas such as process validation, control strategies, or facility readiness.

3. Briefing Package Preparation

QxP lead or support development of a clear, targeted briefing document, including:

Manufacturing site and process descriptions; control strategies and critical process parameters (CPPs); status of validation and readiness for inspection.

We ensure alignment with FDA’s format requirements and timelines (briefing packages are usually due 1 month before the meeting).

4. Cross-functional Coordination

We coordinate between internal CMC, regulatory, QA, and manufacturing teams to ensure consistent messaging and readiness and we help identify and mitigate potential red flags ahead of the meeting.

5. Mock Meeting and Coaching

QxP conducts mock meetings to prepare the sponsor team for FDA questions.  We coach presenters and SMEs (subject matter experts) on how to communicate clearly and handle challenging questions.

6. Participation in the Meeting

We can join the FDA meeting to support the sponsor team, answer questions, or manage follow-up commitments.  We ensure meeting minutes are accurate and track post-meeting commitments.

7. Post-Meeting Follow-Up

QxP will analyze FDA feedback and integrate it into the overall regulatory and manufacturing strategy and assist in preparing any additional documentation or commitment tracking required before approval.

QxP has a depth of strong regulatory and technical knowledge.  We have a strong background in CMC regulatory affairs.  We are recognized by the US FDA and have extensive experience with FDA meeting logistics and submission process.  We are familiar with pre-approval inspection (PAI) expectations and QbD (Quality by Design) principles.

Quality Executive Partners is the essential link between technical team and regulatory authorities.  We ensure that no insight is lost, and no requirement is overlooked.  This results in your accelerated approvals and de-risking development of your submission.   We play a pivotal role in getting to market in the most efficient way possible.  

Give Us a Call.


QxP Vice President Christine Feaster is a 20+ year veteran in pharma quality assurance. Prior to joining QxP, Christine was a vice president of U.S. Pharmacopeia.

Quality Executive Partners (QxP) plays an even greater strategic role in shaping the narrative, anticipating FDA concerns, and ensuring thorough documentation, especially for advanced or outsourced manufacturing models.  With changes in political administration there are few policy shifts and enforcement trends worth noting that may influence how these meetings are approached.

1. Emphasis on Advanced Manufacturing & Supply Chain Resilience

The current administration has continued to support initiatives started under previous administrations to modernize pharmaceutical manufacturing.  This includes advanced manufacturing (e.g., continuous manufacturing, real-time release testing).  Stress on domestic production incentives for critical drugs/therapies for chronic conditions and biologics.  These areas of focus could lead to more scrutiny in pre-approval meetings for manufacturers using new technologies or non-domestic sites—consultants may be especially valuable in helping sponsors frame these discussions effectively.

2. Heightened Focus on Quality & Supply Chain Oversight

There’s an ongoing FDA push for proactive quality risk management, especially for Sterile products, complex biologics, or outsourced manufacturing.  Foreign sites, where increased remote and hybrid inspections have been a thing of the most recent past have changed last week to be more frequent and unsurprisingly unannounced.  These areas of focus may result in tougher pre-approval inspections and more detailed CMC inquiries during meetings—emphasizing the need for well-prepared briefing packages and clear process validation data.

3. Equity, Access, and Shortage Mitigation

There is extreme political pressure to reduce drug shortages and improve access to generics and biosimilars has led to faster review timelines for certain priority generics.  Increased scrutiny on supply chain robustness and site redundancy during pre-approval discussions is in focus.  And if your product falls under priority pathways (e.g., CGT, 505(b)(2), accelerated approval, biosimilars), expect closer FDA attention to your CMC readiness and greater emphasis on post-approval commitments.

4. Administrative Tone: Transparency & Data Integrity

FDA leadership continues to stress transparency, data integrity, and enforcement, especially following several high-profile manufacturing issues (e.g., contamination, mislabeling, or unreliable data).  Expect pre-approval meetings to reflect this stance, with direct questions about data systems, validation status, and GMP compliance—areas where consultants can add real value in preparing responses.

In summary, we know that the core structure and utility of pre-approval manufacturing meetings are unchanged.  What’s shifting is the regulatory tone and focus—more proactive, risk-based, and digitally informed. Consultants now play an even greater strategic role in shaping the narrative, anticipating FDA concerns, and ensuring thorough documentation, especially for advanced or outsourced manufacturing models.


The Role We Play

1. Strategic Planning & Meeting Justification

QxP helps determine whether a pre-approval manufacturing meeting is appropriate.  We assist in crafting the rationale and objectives for requesting the meeting. We ensure the timing aligns with regulatory milestones (e.g., prior to pre-approval inspection or in response to late-cycle review questions).

2. Meeting Request Submission

QxP drafts the formal meeting request letter, ensuring it follows FDA’s expectations (per guidance like the “Formal Meetings Between the FDA and Sponsors or Applicants…”).  We then define and prioritize questions to the FDA, focusing on areas such as process validation, control strategies, or facility readiness.

3. Briefing Package Preparation

QxP lead or support development of a clear, targeted briefing document, including:

Manufacturing site and process descriptions; control strategies and critical process parameters (CPPs); status of validation and readiness for inspection.

We ensure alignment with FDA’s format requirements and timelines (briefing packages are usually due 1 month before the meeting).

4. Cross-functional Coordination

We coordinate between internal CMC, regulatory, QA, and manufacturing teams to ensure consistent messaging and readiness and we help identify and mitigate potential red flags ahead of the meeting.

5. Mock Meeting and Coaching

QxP conducts mock meetings to prepare the sponsor team for FDA questions.  We coach presenters and SMEs (subject matter experts) on how to communicate clearly and handle challenging questions.

6. Participation in the Meeting

We can join the FDA meeting to support the sponsor team, answer questions, or manage follow-up commitments.  We ensure meeting minutes are accurate and track post-meeting commitments.

7. Post-Meeting Follow-Up

QxP will analyze FDA feedback and integrate it into the overall regulatory and manufacturing strategy and assist in preparing any additional documentation or commitment tracking required before approval.

QxP has a depth of strong regulatory and technical knowledge.  We have a strong background in CMC regulatory affairs.  We are recognized by the US FDA and have extensive experience with FDA meeting logistics and submission process.  We are familiar with pre-approval inspection (PAI) expectations and QbD (Quality by Design) principles.

Quality Executive Partners is the essential link between technical team and regulatory authorities.  We ensure that no insight is lost, and no requirement is overlooked.  This results in your accelerated approvals and de-risking development of your submission.   We play a pivotal role in getting to market in the most efficient way possible.  

Give Us a Call.


QxP Vice President Christine Feaster is a 20+ year veteran in pharma quality assurance. Prior to joining QxP, Christine was a vice president of U.S. Pharmacopeia.

The High-Performing Team

Mark Roache
July 2, 2025

Another failed CAPA

Mark Roache
June 19, 2025

Mastering the Molecular Maze

Christine Feaster
June 17, 2025

ADVANCING ONSHORING: Strengthening U.S. Pharma Through Innovation and Oversight

Mark Roache
Glenn Barbrey
May 27, 2025

Why You Need a Consultancy During Uncertain Times

Christine Feaster
May 23, 2025

Building Supplier Resilience Amid Onshoring and Tariff Risks

Christine Feaster
May 19, 2025

Virtual Reality - Reshaping Education Across the Pharmaceutical Landscape.

Christine Feaster
May 14, 2025

Transferring Success: Best Practices for Pharma Onshoring

Christine Feaster
May 6, 2025

Quality Metrics in Pharma

Christine Feaster
May 2, 2025

The Value Of Quality

Mark Roache
May 2, 2025

From CRL to Approval: QxP Navigates FDA Feedback with Timeliness and Precision

Christine Feaster
April 24, 2025

Training for Impact and Excellence

Sarah Boynton
April 15, 2025

Deviation and OOS Investigations in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Tamer Helmy, PhD
April 10, 2025

Is Your Contamination Control Strategy Delivering What It Should?

Christine Feaster
April 9, 2025

The Hallmarks of a Successful Pharma Consultancy

Christine Feaster
January 14, 2025

Pharmaceutical Predictions for 2025

Christine Feaster
December 11, 2024

The Crucial Nexus: Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Christine Feaster
May 17, 2024

Pharmaceutical Industry Trends for 2024 So Far

Christine Feaster
April 24, 2024

Decoding the Technical Transfer Process in Biotech Manufacturing

Sarah Boynton
April 23, 2024

Quality Executive Partners - IACET Accreditation

Ken Mead
April 9, 2024

Coaching and Correcting: A Focus on Behavior Over Blame

Sarah Boynton
November 1, 2023

The Importance of Roles and Responsibilities in Biotech Manufacturing & Human Error Prevention

Sarah Boynton
October 26, 2023

Remote cGMP Inspections and AI in Drug Manufacturing

Michelle Fishburne
October 11, 2023

4 Best Practices for Effective Investigation into Deviations

Sarah Boynton
September 19, 2023

The Art of Viral Vector Manufacturing: 4 Essential Controls to Prevent Cross-Contamination

Sarah Boynton
September 13, 2023

Practicing Risk Acceptance

Mark Roache
August 28, 2023

Annex 1 – Can we all take a deep breath now?

Vanessa Figueroa
August 24, 2023

In Cell and Gene, Good Science is Necessary, But Not Sufficient

Mark Roache
August 21, 2023

6 Ways To Achieve Manufacturing Audit And Inspection Readiness

Sarah Boynton
August 14, 2023

Experience is What You Get Just After You Needed It, Part 1

Mark Roache
August 10, 2023

Experience is What You Get Just After You Needed It, Part 2

Mark Roache
August 10, 2023

Sterility Assurance Matters to This ONE

Greg Gibb
August 8, 2023

Enhancing Quality and Safety: 3 Essential Human Error Prevention Tools for cGMP Manufacturing

Sarah Boynton
August 3, 2023

Asia-Pacific Happenings: Samsung Bioepis Implements QxP Virtuosi®

Michelle Fishburne
August 2, 2023

CDMOs – Selecting the Right One for Each Manufacturing Stage

Christine Feaster
July 24, 2023

3 Types of Human Error and Potential CAPAs to Prevent Them

Sarah Boynton
July 20, 2023

Drug Shortages: Causes & Solutions

Christine Feaster
July 10, 2023

The 5 Questions You Need to Ask After a Human Error Event Occurs

Sarah Boynton
July 5, 2023

Understanding How Adults Learn

Mike Levitt
June 30, 2023

Annex 1 and Ensuring Filling Technologies Fit the Need

Natasha Howard
June 21, 2023

How to Solve Pharma’s Skilled Workforce Deficit

Jeff Roy
June 20, 2023

ChatGPT Told Me AI is “Imperative” in Pharma Manufacturing

No items found.
June 18, 2023

Get Ready: FDORA’s Unannounced Foreign Inspection Pilot Program is On!

Crystal Mersh
June 6, 2023

Nitrosamines Impurity Challenges

Christine Feaster
June 2, 2023

All You Need to Know About Contamination Control Strategies, Parts 1 and 2

No items found.
June 1, 2023

When is ISO 8 Not ISO 8?

Bob Ferer
May 30, 2023

Cost Of Quality: Worth Every Cent In Bio/Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Crystal Mersh
May 24, 2023

Pharmaceutical Quality is NOT a Spectator Sport

Mike Levitt
May 22, 2023

The Six Keys for Effective Deviation Investigators

Mike Levitt
May 18, 2023

There Has to be a Better Way to Train

Tyler DeWitt, Ph.D.
May 15, 2023

Cell and Gene: Article Series on CGT’s Key Drivers

Mark Roache
May 8, 2023

Bacterial Endotoxin Testing is on the Move

Christine Feaster
May 5, 2023

Top 20 Pharma Company Chooses QxP Virtuosi® Platform

Vanessa Figueroa
May 3, 2023

Crystal Clear: Controls Are Not Enough

Crystal Mersh
April 22, 2023

Myth #2: Proactively Remediating Bad Inspection Outcomes: What’s the benefit?

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Myth #1: Complying with Regulations and Product Specifications

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Is it Time to Outsource Internal Auditing?

Mike Levitt
April 18, 2023

Quality is Number One, Even When Trying to Address Supply Chain Issues

Christine Feaster
April 14, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 1

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 2

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023