Transferring Success: Best Practices for Pharma Onshoring

Reshoring or onshoring pharmaceutical manufacturing processes can be a complex yet rewarding endeavor. Whether driven by geopolitical factors, supply chain challenges, or the desire to have greater control over production, it requires careful planning, clear communication, and strict adherence to regulatory standards to ensure the transition is seamless. In this blog, we will explore the key steps involved in the tech transfer process for reshoring or onshoring pharmaceuticals.

The first critical step in any tech transfer process is conducting a comprehensive risk assessment. This helps identify potential risks associated with shifting production to a new site, such as quality control issues, supply chain disruptions, and compliance with local regulations. A gap analysis should be performed to compare the capabilities of the existing site with those of the new facility, particularly focusing on equipment, process control systems, and environmental controls. This assessment ensures that the new site is well-suited for the pharmaceutical products being transferred.

Next, it is essential to document all existing processes. Clear documentation of the current manufacturing process serves as a baseline and highlights areas that may require improvement or carry risks. This documentation includes standard operating procedures (SOPs), process flow diagrams, control strategies for critical process parameters, and batch records. Having accurate, up-to-date records ensures that the tech transfer will proceed smoothly and that no vital steps are missed.

Once the existing processes are documented, it’s time to assess the capabilities of the new facility. The new site must meet the stringent requirements for Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and have the necessary infrastructure, equipment, and expertise to handle the production. This may involve upgrading or purchasing new equipment, ensuring that the facility can support the specific needs of the pharmaceutical products being transferred.

With the foundational work completed, the next step is to define the tech transfer plan. This detailed plan outlines the steps, timelines, resources, and responsibilities involved in transferring the process. Key personnel from both the sending and receiving sites must be identified, and the timeline for each phase of the transfer should be established. It is also critical to specify the training requirements for the receiving site’s team and establish the necessary qualification and validation protocols, including installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ).

Training is a significant part of the process, and it is crucial to ensure that the receiving site’s team has the proper knowledge and skills to operate the new processes. This involves hands-on training, workshops, and providing clear documentation. Training should focus on the technical aspects of the processes, equipment operation, quality control practices, and troubleshooting. The goal is to make sure that the new site’s team can operate independently and effectively after the transfer.

Once training is complete, the next step is to perform pilot runs and validation. These runs are essential to validate that the transferred processes work as intended in the new facility. During pilot runs, the team can assess consistency, quality, and regulatory compliance. Any discrepancies or adjustments can be identified and corrected before scaling up to full production. This step is crucial to ensuring that the new site can handle large-scale production without any hiccups.

As the tech transfer progresses, it’s necessary to update all regulatory documentation to reflect the new manufacturing site. This includes submitting updated facility registrations, product dossiers, and batch records to regulatory authorities such as the FDA or EMA. Keeping regulatory filings current is essential for maintaining compliance and avoiding delays in product approvals or shipments.

Even after the transfer is complete, ongoing monitoring is required. The new site must maintain consistent product quality and comply with all regulatory standards. A continuous monitoring program should be implemented to track production metrics, conduct regular audits and inspections, and optimize processes based on real-time data. This ongoing oversight ensures that the new site remains in good standing and continuously improves its operations.

Finally, once the transfer process is fully established, a final knowledge transfer occurs. This step ensures that the receiving site takes full ownership of the processes. The sending site may provide continued support during the initial period after the transfer to ensure smooth operations. Over time, the receiving site assumes complete responsibility for the process and its continuous improvement.

Reshoring or onshoring pharmaceutical processes is a challenging yet essential part of modern manufacturing. By following a structured, thorough tech transfer process, companies can ensure a smooth transition, minimize risks, and maintain product quality. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve, tech transfer will play an increasingly important role in building resilient and efficient supply chains.


QxP Vice President Christine Feaster is a 20+ year veteran in pharma quality assurance. Prior to joining QxP, Christine was a vice president of U.S. Pharmacopeia.

Reshoring or onshoring pharmaceutical manufacturing processes can be a complex yet rewarding endeavor. Whether driven by geopolitical factors, supply chain challenges, or the desire to have greater control over production, it requires careful planning, clear communication, and strict adherence to regulatory standards to ensure the transition is seamless. In this blog, we will explore the key steps involved in the tech transfer process for reshoring or onshoring pharmaceuticals.

The first critical step in any tech transfer process is conducting a comprehensive risk assessment. This helps identify potential risks associated with shifting production to a new site, such as quality control issues, supply chain disruptions, and compliance with local regulations. A gap analysis should be performed to compare the capabilities of the existing site with those of the new facility, particularly focusing on equipment, process control systems, and environmental controls. This assessment ensures that the new site is well-suited for the pharmaceutical products being transferred.

Next, it is essential to document all existing processes. Clear documentation of the current manufacturing process serves as a baseline and highlights areas that may require improvement or carry risks. This documentation includes standard operating procedures (SOPs), process flow diagrams, control strategies for critical process parameters, and batch records. Having accurate, up-to-date records ensures that the tech transfer will proceed smoothly and that no vital steps are missed.

Once the existing processes are documented, it’s time to assess the capabilities of the new facility. The new site must meet the stringent requirements for Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and have the necessary infrastructure, equipment, and expertise to handle the production. This may involve upgrading or purchasing new equipment, ensuring that the facility can support the specific needs of the pharmaceutical products being transferred.

With the foundational work completed, the next step is to define the tech transfer plan. This detailed plan outlines the steps, timelines, resources, and responsibilities involved in transferring the process. Key personnel from both the sending and receiving sites must be identified, and the timeline for each phase of the transfer should be established. It is also critical to specify the training requirements for the receiving site’s team and establish the necessary qualification and validation protocols, including installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ).

Training is a significant part of the process, and it is crucial to ensure that the receiving site’s team has the proper knowledge and skills to operate the new processes. This involves hands-on training, workshops, and providing clear documentation. Training should focus on the technical aspects of the processes, equipment operation, quality control practices, and troubleshooting. The goal is to make sure that the new site’s team can operate independently and effectively after the transfer.

Once training is complete, the next step is to perform pilot runs and validation. These runs are essential to validate that the transferred processes work as intended in the new facility. During pilot runs, the team can assess consistency, quality, and regulatory compliance. Any discrepancies or adjustments can be identified and corrected before scaling up to full production. This step is crucial to ensuring that the new site can handle large-scale production without any hiccups.

As the tech transfer progresses, it’s necessary to update all regulatory documentation to reflect the new manufacturing site. This includes submitting updated facility registrations, product dossiers, and batch records to regulatory authorities such as the FDA or EMA. Keeping regulatory filings current is essential for maintaining compliance and avoiding delays in product approvals or shipments.

Even after the transfer is complete, ongoing monitoring is required. The new site must maintain consistent product quality and comply with all regulatory standards. A continuous monitoring program should be implemented to track production metrics, conduct regular audits and inspections, and optimize processes based on real-time data. This ongoing oversight ensures that the new site remains in good standing and continuously improves its operations.

Finally, once the transfer process is fully established, a final knowledge transfer occurs. This step ensures that the receiving site takes full ownership of the processes. The sending site may provide continued support during the initial period after the transfer to ensure smooth operations. Over time, the receiving site assumes complete responsibility for the process and its continuous improvement.

Reshoring or onshoring pharmaceutical processes is a challenging yet essential part of modern manufacturing. By following a structured, thorough tech transfer process, companies can ensure a smooth transition, minimize risks, and maintain product quality. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to evolve, tech transfer will play an increasingly important role in building resilient and efficient supply chains.


QxP Vice President Christine Feaster is a 20+ year veteran in pharma quality assurance. Prior to joining QxP, Christine was a vice president of U.S. Pharmacopeia.

Quality Metrics in Pharma

Christine Feaster
May 2, 2025

The Value Of Quality

Mark Roache
May 2, 2025

From CRL to Approval: QxP Navigates FDA Feedback with Timeliness and Precision

Christine Feaster
April 24, 2025

Training for Impact and Excellence

Sarah Boynton
April 15, 2025

Deviation and OOS Investigations in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Tamer Helmy, PhD
April 10, 2025

Is Your Contamination Control Strategy Delivering What It Should?

Christine Feaster
April 9, 2025

The Hallmarks of a Successful Pharma Consultancy

Christine Feaster
January 14, 2025

Pharmaceutical Predictions for 2025

Christine Feaster
December 11, 2024

The Crucial Nexus: Data Integrity in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Christine Feaster
May 17, 2024

Pharmaceutical Industry Trends for 2024 So Far

Christine Feaster
April 24, 2024

Decoding the Technical Transfer Process in Biotech Manufacturing

Sarah Boynton
April 23, 2024

Quality Executive Partners - IACET Accreditation

Ken Mead
April 9, 2024

Coaching and Correcting: A Focus on Behavior Over Blame

Sarah Boynton
November 1, 2023

The Importance of Roles and Responsibilities in Biotech Manufacturing & Human Error Prevention

Sarah Boynton
October 26, 2023

Remote cGMP Inspections and AI in Drug Manufacturing

Michelle Fishburne
October 11, 2023

4 Best Practices for Effective Investigation into Deviations

Sarah Boynton
September 19, 2023

The Art of Viral Vector Manufacturing: 4 Essential Controls to Prevent Cross-Contamination

Sarah Boynton
September 13, 2023

Practicing Risk Acceptance

Mark Roache
August 28, 2023

Annex 1 – Can we all take a deep breath now?

Vanessa Figueroa
August 24, 2023

In Cell and Gene, Good Science is Necessary, But Not Sufficient

Mark Roache
August 21, 2023

6 Ways To Achieve Manufacturing Audit And Inspection Readiness

Sarah Boynton
August 14, 2023

Experience is What You Get Just After You Needed It, Part 1

Mark Roache
August 10, 2023

Experience is What You Get Just After You Needed It, Part 2

Mark Roache
August 10, 2023

Sterility Assurance Matters to This ONE

Greg Gibb
August 8, 2023

Enhancing Quality and Safety: 3 Essential Human Error Prevention Tools for cGMP Manufacturing

Sarah Boynton
August 3, 2023

Asia-Pacific Happenings: Samsung Bioepis Implements QxP Virtuosi®

Michelle Fishburne
August 2, 2023

CDMOs – Selecting the Right One for Each Manufacturing Stage

Christine Feaster
July 24, 2023

3 Types of Human Error and Potential CAPAs to Prevent Them

Sarah Boynton
July 20, 2023

Drug Shortages: Causes & Solutions

Christine Feaster
July 10, 2023

The 5 Questions You Need to Ask After a Human Error Event Occurs

Sarah Boynton
July 5, 2023

Understanding How Adults Learn

Mike Levitt
June 30, 2023

Annex 1 and Ensuring Filling Technologies Fit the Need

Natasha Howard
June 21, 2023

How to Solve Pharma’s Skilled Workforce Deficit

Jeff Roy
June 20, 2023

ChatGPT Told Me AI is “Imperative” in Pharma Manufacturing

No items found.
June 18, 2023

Get Ready: FDORA’s Unannounced Foreign Inspection Pilot Program is On!

Crystal Mersh
June 6, 2023

Nitrosamines Impurity Challenges

Christine Feaster
June 2, 2023

All You Need to Know About Contamination Control Strategies, Parts 1 and 2

No items found.
June 1, 2023

When is ISO 8 Not ISO 8?

Bob Ferer
May 30, 2023

Cost Of Quality: Worth Every Cent In Bio/Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Crystal Mersh
May 24, 2023

Pharmaceutical Quality is NOT a Spectator Sport

Mike Levitt
May 22, 2023

The Six Keys for Effective Deviation Investigators

Mike Levitt
May 18, 2023

There Has to be a Better Way to Train

Tyler DeWitt, Ph.D.
May 15, 2023

Cell and Gene: Article Series on CGT’s Key Drivers

Mark Roache
May 8, 2023

Bacterial Endotoxin Testing is on the Move

Christine Feaster
May 5, 2023

Top 20 Pharma Company Chooses QxP Virtuosi® Platform

Vanessa Figueroa
May 3, 2023

Crystal Clear: Controls Are Not Enough

Crystal Mersh
April 22, 2023

Myth #2: Proactively Remediating Bad Inspection Outcomes: What’s the benefit?

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Myth #1: Complying with Regulations and Product Specifications

Brian Duncan
April 20, 2023

Is it Time to Outsource Internal Auditing?

Mike Levitt
April 18, 2023

Quality is Number One, Even When Trying to Address Supply Chain Issues

Christine Feaster
April 14, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 1

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023

Don’t Be a Daredevil When Retrofitting Your Facility, Part 2

Bob Ferer
April 10, 2023